Views: 183
Written By Abdun Nur
What is Ownership?
Ownership is the key building block in the establishment and advancement of the modern capitalist socio-economic system, now utilised to enslave mankind, pollute the earth and drain all resources from nature and humanity collectively, under the control of a comparatively small number of people, but what is ownership?
Ownership is a form of Usury. Usury is a one-sided extraction of the fruits of the labours of another, which has 5 basic forms:
Debt (the interest demanded for the use of loaned money)
Profit (the interest demanded for the use of capital)
Rental (the interest demanded for the use of infrastructure)
Taxation (the interest demanded for the use of your labour)
Ownership (the interest demanded for the use of land)
Ownership is granted title (granted from a superior (master) to an inferior (slave)), which is separated and held by the different parties of master and slave, which means, when you buy immovable resources it’s always under the idea of ‘Sharing gains’; gains that are expected to be generated by the tenant from the owned resource, such as land, or the natural resources land holds. The land and permanent structures upon the land are immovable resources, but even other types of resources can be held under similar shared gain ownership (control) systems.
‘Ownership’ (meaning to have control over) this is the original Norman feudal preference for land utilisation. In the British feudal system the Crown corporation re-presents the owners (legal possessors) of all land, and every citizen (slave) who occupies land pays the crown corporation rent directly or indirectly; the Crown imposes claimed ‘benefits’ for the tenant to justify the extortion of taxation, labelled ‘Property tax’, ‘Rates’, ‘Council Tax’, etc., paid to the state corporation.
So everything under ownership is held by the (corporate) crown (UK or corporate state in other fiefdoms (countries)) and they require a share of the gain from that “title”, which is there (legal) en‘title’ment; additionally as they hold second (after the Church) title, they can take possession of the land whenever they require from the tenant, who purchased the deed of tenancy or license attached to those immovable resources. The Roman Catholic Church holds title to the entire planet under this fraud and all corporate states are ‘chartered’ by the Church.
A Charter – a superior granting an inferior man/woman, or those re-presented as a constructed legal fiction, a right or privilege (privilege – a right to steal)
The manmade concept of ownership was constructed as a legal fiction and applied through imposed trust law (positive law, meaning – positively imposed through the threat or use of the force of arms, and is exclusively applicable to slaves), the ‘simple trust’.
With a simple trust, beneficiaries (economic slaves) are responsible for paying income tax on all income, even if the trust doesn’t distribute it for their collective benefit. This requires the living soul being re-presented as a constructed legal fiction, as a living soul cannot be a slave inherently. It’s claimed an “Irrevocable trust” which refers to any trust where the grantor cannot change or end the trust after its creation.
Once ownership is constructed as a legal fiction the authors have authority over that construct. So, from ownership is derived sovereignty and constructed authority (claimed inherent power) held in fictions, and from that construct the imposition of legal codes (known as positive law or slave law). Through the creation of a ‘simple trust’ all souls become the property if they exist upon the owned land, as wildlife to be farmed, and the constructed legal fiction of citizen is imposed upon each owned soul, binding all through force of arms to the dictates of the authors of the constructed legal fictions of citizen, these written dictates are authored by the owners or their re-presentatives so are the authority forming constructed legal codes, in which all resources are simply held completely, permanently, and inalienably in the legal ownership of one constructed legal fiction of a corporation (person) for the controlled ‘use’ of a citizen.
The nature of the trust is constrained by the way the legal codes of commerce are structured upon that owned chattel. Unfortunately for those who suffer this encroachment, the one who controls a thing, makes the laws (dictates of the landlord) that govern it.
The term ‘law’ is a solemn expression of the “legislative power”. It orders and permits and forbids. (Black’s law dictionary page 700)
Law is a term exclusively defined as imposed authority of corporate policy, in direct opposition to inherent power, which function upon protective axioms free of orders, permits and prohibitions. The landlords ‘word’ was law, a superior over an inferior man; the true term, that law is used in place of, is ‘Axiom’, meaning a self-evident truth that possess simple to identify proofs, so, requires no effort, or need, to prove, a universally accepted principle or rule. The axioms of the land, the natural axioms, that all of mankind are bound by, are unalienable, universal and immutable across the entire earth.
The corporations of (E)State claim ‘Jurisdiction’ as the power and authority (labelled ‘constitutionally’ established) with respect to the “act of settling, settled condition, anything arranged or settled upon, regulated, ordered, or in ordinance,” being the imposed policy of the corporate State (Mafia) or feudal lord in control of the land, that conferred authority upon a court or judge to pronounce the sentence of their Lord (feudal superior).
This is why if you leave the area (State fiefdom) held by a landlord, you’re outside of their jurisdiction, as they impose through their control of the land, upon all slaves within or upon it.
Why are the axioms of the land unalienable and immutable?
The courts function as mediums of arbitration between a complainer (plaintiff) and a defendant, the complainer must ‘prove’ their claim. The fictions of ownership, legislation, statutes, charters, acts, constitutions, corporation and contract must be ‘proven’ to stand as fact in the court. The court will ‘presume’ that all un-rebutted claims are accepted as fact by the defendant.
A ‘defendant’ means – ‘against whom a claim or charge is brought in a court’ and is a term based in granted rights. This term is further exposed with the term ‘defender’ meaning ‘to serve as attorney for (a defendant)’.
As a living soul you are ineligible to use any legal court for arbitration, as all legal courts are based “exclusively” in constructed fictions, such as corporation, and a living soul is substantive, the court must get you to consent to be re-presented as a constructed legal fiction before any arbitration can commence. This is achieved through the living soul accepting any one of the following, to be re-presented either by a lawyer or other fraudster, or by accepting to re–present (as a constructed legal fiction and not a living soul) themselves, accepting a legal name, accepting a fiction placed before their name, such as Mr, Doctor, Mrs etc., or accepting the authority of the court in action or word.
But if you are fool hardy enough to consent to be the re-presentative of a constructed legal fiction on the (holy) SEE of commerce, then you would be best rebutting all claims founded on the fiction of ownership, by doing so you strip away the presumed authority of the fictions built upon it. When challenged the complainer must prove the fiction their claim is based upon, it is impossible to ‘prove a legal fiction as fact through evidence’ as all fictions by definition are lies; therefore if the ‘legal fiction’ of State, corporation, church, legislation, etc., cannot prove their claim of authority it cannot stand.
The constructed fiction of the citizen that is adrift on the (holy) SEE of commerce, when consented to by a living soul to re-present them, is based upon granted rights from a superior (owner – only title can own, those with title are entitled, so grant title), to an inferior (slave), rights are exclusively for slaves. This model is feudal going back to fealty, meaning fidelity, sworn to the feudal liege lord who was then ‘entitled’ to allegiance and service from his vassal (slave).
In contrast the axioms of the land are the natural innate reality of all living souls; they can be proven and so stand as unalienable, immutable and indefeasible truths of the equitable reciprocal obligation and responsibility through the inherent power each soul possess, based on the reason determined through the reciprocal duty of care.
Due to modern courts functioning as commercial trusts for profit, they are not limited to arbitration, but actively impose fictions through un-rebutted presumption of law (legal codes) and un-rebutted fact, removing the burden of proof from the complainer (plaintiff), reversing the basis of arbitration. Therefore the defendant must counterclaim, to activate the eye of equity upon the plaintiff and DEMAND proof of all claims, assertions or declarations, the Crown corporation is the plaintiff in the legal slave courts, any victim is only a witness for the Crown.
Counterclaim is a direct claim from the defending party against the party who initiated the lawsuit for concurrent claims, including being wrongfully sued.
The answer to suffering a system that does not arbitrate wrongs, is to establish arbitration without using the corrupt court system, but instead through forming independently, the witena-gemot’s to arbitrate terrente (meaning someone down to earth (terra), realistic and sensible of mind, referencing a system of arbitration for those with the peace of this state of mind threatened) relief. Legal courts exclusively use constructed legal fictions, a true arbitration system would be free of all constructed legal fictions, and arbitrate only wrongs between living souls free of any need for written laws or agreements imposed, that you are not a direct party to, or that are not reciprocal in structure.
‘Legal’ Re-presentation exists exclusively for those “Not” “Mentally Competent”
Those acting as merchants for the landlord are known as:
Attorney – ‘attorn’ the land to their Lords. The word attorn means to acknowledge the relation of a tenant to a new landlord.
- Solicitor – who ‘solicit’, they entreat or petition or beg the landlord for those who are not mentally competent.
- Lawyer means law trader, the ‘landlords’ trader in authored dictates.
These parasites act for constructed fictions of status, for example a ‘Human Being’, also known as “Human”, is a term deliberately created in the 16th Century to update the naming of perpetual slaves to the Lords of the Land from the 13th Century term “Serf”. Human is derived from two Latin words humi meaning “land, soil, country, on the ground” and anus meaning “rectum, (marriage/pledge) ring, old”. Hence the word Human literally means “married/bound to the land/earth” and Human Being legally means “land creature” also known as chattel – the idea mankind are cattle upon the “land” of the ‘owner’.
Once a criminal holds the land by force of arms those upon the land are slaves, and so the owner (controller) of the land imposes legal codes founded on five impositions. All resources would be:
1. Subject to the duty (imposition) of servitude, binding those on the land to shared gains (taxation).
2) Subject to the duty (imposition) of repossessing the land and resources from tenants (expropriation) at the whim of the granter of title.
3) Subject to the duty (imposition) to inherit (steal) the land, resources and tenancy of those without heirs (escheat)
4) Subject to the duty (imposition) of regulation of all upon the owned property. (Positive laws known as Legislation are contrived legal codes placed upon the immutable axioms of the land, to obscure them, so preventing equitable protection for the individual)
5) Subject to the duty (imposition) of termination of tenancy without recourse. (Eminent domain)
The modern ‘Trusts’ are based on the Roman Catholic Templars model, were the “Father” is the grantor of the trust, he invests the substance, being the real physical value, so he is the executor, the “Son” is the administrator of the trust he is the trustee, who can gain no benefit himself, the “Holy Ghost” is the incorporeal entity that holds the substance in a legal instrument.
The Roman Catholic Church makes the first claim from which all subsequent claims flow, as within the axioms of the land we can only own what we ourselves create, this means the creator of the Earth and the resources of the Earth belong in their entirety to the Creator. The religious parasites realised that if you could make the Creator a man, from that fraud you could claim ownership of the entire Earth and her resources and all souls upon it, the Pope is the substitute for Christ (God) on Earth, and the spiritual adviser to Christ (God) within their fraud. The Ba’alist model externalises or reverses reality, they invent a God entities in the sky, and personify, objectify, and represent and so reverse the real for the contrived, or fictional.
One’s Own
Based on the natural inherent power concept of ‘you can only own what you yourself create’; you ‘own’ only your labours, you cannot ‘own’ the substance itself, only the labours invested within it.
It’s a different frame of mind, once you grasp that idea you will be able to see the foundations of control of your ‘own’ labours.
The word ‘own’ has two opposite meanings, one is internal one is external.
The internal ‘own’ is real, the external ‘own’ is a constructed fiction.
“I ‘own’ this land.” This is the external idea of ownership; in whom is vested (clothed in the robes of) ‘ownership’, title of property, a title granted externally by a superior, a grant claimed, registered, taxed, and regulated; A ship of commerce; ‘ownership’.
“This is my ‘own’ land.” This is the internal idea of allodial utilisation; to acknowledge as one’s own, recognize within your-self, as having full inherent power, through custodial dominion though the agreement, and so support, of your neighbours.
What you truly ‘own’ is all you have earned, the skills of the mind and hand, the memories of experience and study, the words you speak and the thoughts you harbour; you ‘own’ the efforts you have invested and the fruits of those efforts, beyond that you can only justify equitable utilisation.
The true utilisation of land you hold, binds you to full accountability, making you fully liable, as no other can own the land you utilise, and demand payment for nothing, that is fraud or slavery.
What is Real Estate?
Real (the word ‘real’ relates to a thing (Latin. res, “matter, thing”)) – Estate is all interests in land held by a deceased person at death, or a body of men/women united or combined into one body, to make a legal corps (dead body), known as corporation whose holdings are known as mortmain, ‘the dead mans hand’. The corporate state owns (as an un-rebutted claim) all property ‘legally’ as inalienable, but that is directly against the axioms of the land.
All estate is ownership (control) of resources by a corps (dead body).
Estate from Old French ‘estat’, from Latin meaning status – condition – state. So the state, condition, status of ‘death’.
Many corporations exist from church, state, police, banks to colleges, universities and schools, etc. all function as a legal corps (dead body).
So to own immovable resources through estate as tenant you have to represent your own corporation, or corps, this requires a straw man, and so the certificate of natural birth becomes the owner, and you represent the fiction becoming the head of the corporation titled ‘Mr’ (if your a man).
From this fiction, new legal frauds can be imposed – Tenement (holding as a possession) – immovable resources, such as land, rents, or franchises, held by one person leasing it from/to another.
Under the axioms of the land a “dead” man or woman cannot possess immovable resources, in truth they can possess nothing, their dead, and it immediately falls to their inheritor/s.
Ignorance of the axioms of the land allows the fiction of title of estate; it’s through authored documents that lays claim over the land in colour of law, a title is a grant from a superior to an inferior man or woman.
No equitable possession and utilisation of land exists for a constructed legal fiction, banks and corporations like Real Estate because they can control land, resources and structures, and seek rent, when under the axioms of the land they cannot. They and others can also use the fiction of title to seize land under the colour of law.
The colour of law denotes the “mere semblance of legal right”, the “pretence or appearance of” right; hence, an action done under colour of law colours (adjusts) the law to the circumstance, yet said legal action repudiate the axioms of the land, provable through reason alone.
What is a Land Patent?
A land patent, is within the legal authored codes, rights to a tract of land, which was acquired by treaty (a legal contract (fictional) between two legal fictions of corporate states to manage immovable resources) held by the corporate state, through which the government grants an individual or corporation entitlement of use while they are under the control and dictates of the author/s of the title.
A land patent serves as a legal (not equitable) proof of land ownership (colour of law control). Land patents have more power than any other ‘legal’ (not equitable) document in establishing proof of land ownership (control).
A land patent is perceived to be a ‘legally’ indisputable document. Additionally, legislation mandates that land gained through a land patent is not liable for taxation, so corporation, as it may only be held by a sovereign entity, like the Roman Catholic Church Corporation, or the Banking Corporations; holders of land patent pay no rent upon it to the state. The land stays in their ownership forever. If a legal straw man (individual) with sovereign title acquires a land patent, their legal heirs are granted ownership of the land after their death.
Corporate State government, local courts and the Supreme (High) Court have no ‘legal’ power to remove land from a sovereign person’s (legal fiction) land patent ownership (control), and the land patent trumps all other ‘legal’ documents. Nobody can ‘legally’ dispute ownership (control).
Which has Benefit, Use with Dual Control or Utilisation?
Ownership is not equitable just as control of a thing is not equitable, slavery is control (ownership) over the actions of a man or woman, ownership is control over the land, no one has the power or ability to control land and grant (rent) a “right” to use of the land to others, so restricting natural resources, hoarding them to deprive those who labour upon it from receiving the fruits of their labours; ownership is control over resources, no one has the right to hoard the resources of the earth, to monopolise, exploit and restrict.
We each of us can only justify equitable utilisation, we came into the world with nothing and we leave with nothing, the labours of our lives we leave behind for the future, the inheritance of our birth to utilise the land and her resources is unalienable, that is “Inherent Power – The Innate Natural Unalienable Equity of Every Living Soul”.
Natural Equitable Allodial Possession and Utilisation
To declare your utilisation of the land cannot be supported within control (ownership) as shared gains of the fruits of those who labour upon the land. I can only fundamentally be within the equitable inherent power of consent and utilisation.
Each individual who wishes to utilise land, must create a bond of behaviour, a declaration witnessed and agreed upon by those surrounding the declared area of utilisation in an equitable written, witnessed unilateral (affecting only them) agreement.
This is further explain in the article: The Unilateral Bond of Behaviour
The bond of behaviour is formed to prevent dispute, verified by the living souls that utilise the land around the physical location of the land stipulated in the bond of behaviour, all bonds are reciprocal, requiring a seal (no signature) and witnessing, by witnessing the bond, they are equally bound to reciprocate the behaviour, as they wish such behaviour from their neighbour, they must return in kind the same behaviour.
This is the only equitable method, whether in evolving an existing possession dominated by the fiction of registration into an equitable allodial utilisation through inherent power, or making any allodial declaration without regard for the frauds of estate, ownership or tenancy.
The easiest method is detail in the article: Allodium Platform
Likewise any alteration, improvements, or structures upon the land that encroach upon those around the declared inherent power of possession and utilisation, such as structures that dominate the views of neighbours, or activities that cause strong foul odours, like pig farming, or excessive noises, beyond what is reasonable, would require the agreement of those directly around them (without prior agreement this would represent an encroachment upon another, as detailed within the original bond of behaviour).
Of course to damage surrounding land or resources utilised by another with environmental poisons of groundwater or air, or any other form of encroachment from utilisation that are not speedily rectified, could forfeit all utilisation of that land, as the bond of behaviour would be broken, and the relief would as stipulated within the behaviour bond would have to be honoured, if this was not honoured, it would be established through arbitration of twenty four peers to establish terrente (the peace of the mind threatened) relief through the axioms of the land.
To consider the neutral (free of imposed violence and hierarchy) model: Arbitration of Disputes Platform
To build structures upon a declared and witnessed utilisation of land, that represents a saleable value of your labour, at the point of sale must comply to the minimum safety standards of the local community, as stipulated within the original bond of behaviour, as to build an unsafe structure endangers the lives of others, and through that logic would be an encroachment upon them (breaking the natural inherent power of a reciprocal duty of care, being an obligation and responsibility each possess for their neighbour expressed through the axioms of the land) this duty of care is not lost, it has no limitation, if your labours are a danger to others then accountability is always a potential.
Under Roman law based upon control (ownership) of land and resources, you had equitable utilisation to control the land to the centre of the earth and the limits of the sky, so that would demand you grant agreement for others to utilisation the sky above your land, and prevents others from mining beneath your land without written, witnessed agreement, as is done by the state today who subvert these Roman legal aspects of the land for their own advantages. This is not in line with natural axioms based upon our inherent power.
Under the logic of natural inherent power each living soul has a reciprocal obligation and responsibility of free passage over any allodial utilisation, both utilised by individuals and communally, as long as they caused no malicious damage or encroachment upon any other while doing so, a holder of allodial utilisation, known as an allodarii, can establish set path of access for free passage around crops or to allow privacy upon their land, which encourages others to remain upon the set paths created.
In the sky above any declared possession all would have a reciprocal obligation and responsibility to allow free passage as long as they did not encroach upon those individuals and communities they passed over, through noise pollution, air pollution, falling objects or chemicals, etc., all these would form encroachments. Noise for example would be reasonable acceptable levels; otherwise the noise of birds would prevent their free access, which would be unreasonable.
Within the axioms of the land only written, witnessed agreements verified between men or women are equitable, you cannot be a party to any fictional contract with a legal fiction, and you cannot have a contract or agreement imposed upon you without your consent and verification.
“We abuse the land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to utilise it with love and respect.” Aldo Leopold
