Written By Abdun Nur
(If you wish to communicate about this article with the author email: email@example.com)
The glaring problem with gravity, as a claimed attraction of mass, is, if it were indeed an attraction of mass, then it would pull in all directions, however gravity only attracts to the center of the planet, if it were an attraction of mass, then when I stood at the side of a huge mountain, I should be pulls sideways slightly, or when I traveled deep into the earth the mass around me and above me should pull me sideways and upward as well as downward, and a mass close to me should have a greater effect, than the mass further away, this is not the case. So the glaring question is, what is the reason this attraction of mass would align itself as a centralized attracting force within a large planetary body and not pull in all directions?
So if gravity is not an attraction of mass what is it?
Gravity begins “pushing” objects towards the Earth at around 3,200 km from its surface, this weak pushing force concentrates the closer it’s drawn and accelerated towards the earths center, this drawing force is generated when the ambient energy of the galaxy is attracted to the metallic elements of the planet, gravity being a residual effect, much weaker than the energy flow.
Magnetic fields extend infinitely, as the Sun travels around the galaxy, its atmosphere absorbs the ambient electromagnetic energy, which transforms the atmosphere of mainly hydrogen gas, into a charged plasma, the gas is not burned off, or used as fuel, it is only electrically charged, generating a temperature of between 2 to 20 million degrees Celsius, while the Suns surface is almost cold at 6000 C. This energy absorption makes all stars grow.
Likewise as the Earth and all other metallic planetary bodies or moons pass through the ambient energy, they to absorb this energy, this absorption makes the crystalline toroidal structure of planets grow, and the mass of the earth has increased steadily as time has passed, the growing Earth is easily exposed through the examination of the much older land masses, which are around 34 km thick, in comparison to the ocean floor which is between 3 to 6 km thick, and if the planet is shrunk down, by reducing the growth of the ocean floor and drawing the old land masses back together, these land masses fit together perfectly as a solid ball,. The earth is expanding as it absorbs ambient energy, which forms new sea bed, this expansion happens along the undersea fault lines
The larger the planet grows the more ambient energy it absorbs, and so the greater the pushing force of gravity becomes, this is demonstrated in the fossil record, when insects dominated the Earth beginning 400 million years ago, they were huge, for example a giant dragonfly-like insects had a wingspan of up to 28 inches. This was possible as the pushing force of gravity was much weaker, as the planet grew insects shrank, a 150 million years until 65 million years (time scale claimed but in question) ago birds with huge wing spans, and dinosaurs that weighed as much as 100 tonnes roamed the planet, but as the Earth continued to grow these too disappeared, as the pushing force of gravity made it impossible for such huge creatures to exist.
The moon absorbs this ambient energy, like all metallic planetary bodies or moons it grows slowly, this reduces the pushing force where the moon interaction with the ambient energy effecting the Earth’s absorption, like a shadow, this reduced pushing force generates tidal fluctuations.
The Earth’s gravity effect ends 3200 km from the earths surface, yet we are told the moon which is 111 times (111 times 3200 km) further away than the earth’s force of gravity, has a gravitational effect that pulls the oceans causing tides. The actual distance of the moon from the earth varies over the course of the orbit of the moon, from 356,500 km (221,500 mi) at the perigee to 406,700 km (252,700 mi) at apogee. Clearly no gravitational force could exist as ‘an attraction of mass’ to do this at such huge distances beyond any detectable gravitational attraction, making the claim the moons gravity as an attraction of mass, effects the earths oceans, nonsense.
Gravity follows an “inverse square law”. If you double your distance from the center of the Earth – the force of gravity drops by a factor of two-squared…four times less strong. If you triple your distance, gravity drops by three-squared…nine times less strong.
This kind of law is very common in physics – it applies to the way light gets dimmer, magnetism less strong and so forth.
For example 90 percent of the pushing force of Earth’s gravity reaches the space station, so you may wonder why do those claimed to be in the space station float around gravity free?
The answer is because they are in free fall. In a vacuum, gravity causes all objects to fall at the same rate. The mass of the object does not matter. If a person drops a hammer and a feather, air will make the feather fall more slowly. But if there were no air, they would fall at the same acceleration. Because of that, the object would appear to float in front of the person. That is what happens in a space station. The space station, its crew and any objects aboard are all falling toward but around Earth. Since they are all falling together, the crew and objects appear to float.
What does it mean to fall around Earth?
Earth’s gravity pushes objects downward toward the surface. Gravity pushes on the space station, too. As a result, it is constantly falling toward Earth’s surface. It also is moving at a very fast speed – 17,500 miles per hour. It moves at a speed that matches the way Earth’s surface curves. If a person throws a baseball, gravity will cause it to curve down. It will hit the ground fairly quickly. An orbiting space station moves at the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. Because of this, the space station keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. As a result, they fall around the planet.
Physicists Do Not Know What Gravity is, Only What it Does!
It’s claimed gravitation is one of the four fundamental forces, but it’s so weak a force, the word “force” becomes nearly meaningless. The strong nuclear force (which keeps atomic nuclei intact) is about 100 times stronger than the electromagnetic force (which creates the light spectrum), which in turn is up to 10,000 times stronger than the weak nuclear force (which facilitates the subatomic interactions responsible for radioactive decay). Three forces, all within six orders of magnitude of one another. Then comes gravitation. It’s about a million billion billion billion times weaker than the weak nuclear force (when considered as an attraction of mass).
This determination of the strength of the force of gravity is claimed based on the wrong idea, that it is caused by an attraction of mass. If the entire mass of a planet can only pull on an object, as an attraction of mass, a tiny tiny bit, then it has a claimed relative strength to electromagnetism of about 1036 times weaker.
Gravitation is the only force that doesn’t have a quantum solution — a theory that explains the force in terms of subatomic particles, as gravity only exists in reality as a residual effect of the flow of energy into a metallic body, much like the flow of water has a force that draws things along as it flows down a valley.
Although people are fooled into believing “scientists” know things, in reality they do not know as much as people think, and much of what is claimed science is built upon frauds, deceptions and lies. Besides not knowing what gravity is, they do not know what energy is, again “scientists” only know what energy does, and even that is limited.
The Electric Universe
Presently the elite, paedophile class of psychopaths, who dominate science through funding, want people to believe the universe is built around the weakest force, gravity. From this false foundation they have generated fantasies such as black holes, dark matter, dark energy and abstract theories of warped space, in order to bolster the utter nonsense of Georges Lemaïtre, a Roman Catholic priest, who constructed the theory of the big bang. This was achieved by corrupting physics in the 1930’s with the nonsense of Einstein, forming a false foundation, and the use of abstract (unrelated to reality- abstracted) mathematics. It is for this reason physics has been stagnant since the 1930’s.
Gravity is not a foundation to explain the nature of the universe, even a very rudimentary grasp on reason would expose that reality, if you want to understand the nature of the universe then study energy, after all 99.999% of all the matter in the universe is plasma.
Plasma is a state of matter in which an ionized gaseous substance becomes highly electrically conductive to the point that long-range electric and magnetic fields dominate the behaviour of the matter. The plasma state can be contrasted with the other states: solid, liquid, and gas.
Any reasoning soul would instantly realise, the fundamental aspect of the universe is plasma not gravity.